Talk:Network DLL - Revision history

Sandman at 10:03, 6 September 2007

2007-09-06T10:03:37Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 6 September 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)		--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)

-	Okay well that's ~~now~~ how it's going to be. ~~Pages~~ will have the categories to which they apply. So [[NET_About]]() for example will have the categories: functions, networkdll, dll.	+	Okay well that's not how it's going to be. This is how it will be: pages will have the categories to which they apply. So [[NET_About]]() for example will have the categories: functions, networkdll, dll.
-	<br>--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 12:02, 6 September 2007 (CEST)	+	<br>--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 12:03, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Sandman at 10:02, 6 September 2007

2007-09-06T10:02:59Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 6 September 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)		--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)

-	Okay well that's now how it's going to be. Pages will have the categories to which they apply. So [[NET_About]]() for example will have the categories: functions, networkdll, dll	+	Okay well that's now how it's going to be. Pages will have the categories to which they apply. So [[NET_About]]() for example will have the categories: functions, networkdll, dll.
	<br>--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 12:02, 6 September 2007 (CEST)		<br>--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 12:02, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Sandman at 10:02, 6 September 2007

2007-09-06T10:02:48Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 6 September 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I'd say the following: We give DLL's the category "dll" and a private category (like "networkdll"). Any article closely related to that DLL gets that category aswell. The functions in that DLL get a seperate private category (like "networkdllfunctions"). This way, one automatic list is generated for DLL's, one for each of their associated articles and one for each of their functions. No manual updating needed. In the category "dll" can be listed the DLL's not yet written about. I'll adjust Network.dll to this system to see if it works.<br />		I'd say the following: We give DLL's the category "dll" and a private category (like "networkdll"). Any article closely related to that DLL gets that category aswell. The functions in that DLL get a seperate private category (like "networkdllfunctions"). This way, one automatic list is generated for DLL's, one for each of their associated articles and one for each of their functions. No manual updating needed. In the category "dll" can be listed the DLL's not yet written about. I'll adjust Network.dll to this system to see if it works.<br />
	--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)		--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)
		+
		+	Okay well that's now how it's going to be. Pages will have the categories to which they apply. So [[NET_About]]() for example will have the categories: functions, networkdll, dll
		+	<br>--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 12:02, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Sandman at 22:55, 15 April 2007

2007-04-15T22:55:07Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 15 April 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I thought that the category was for anything to do with DLLs (inc functions, general information, etc) and therefore a list of DLLs was neccesary to narrow this to just the pages of the DLLs. But if I'm wrong I'll put things back to the way they were. What do you think?<br>		I thought that the category was for anything to do with DLLs (inc functions, general information, etc) and therefore a list of DLLs was neccesary to narrow this to just the pages of the DLLs. But if I'm wrong I'll put things back to the way they were. What do you think?<br>
	--[[User:Yonni\|Yonni]] 14:18, 15 April 2007 (GMT)		--[[User:Yonni\|Yonni]] 14:18, 15 April 2007 (GMT)
		+
		+	I'd say the following: We give DLL's the category "dll" and a private category (like "networkdll"). Any article closely related to that DLL gets that category aswell. The functions in that DLL get a seperate private category (like "networkdllfunctions"). This way, one automatic list is generated for DLL's, one for each of their associated articles and one for each of their functions. No manual updating needed. In the category "dll" can be listed the DLL's not yet written about. I'll adjust Network.dll to this system to see if it works.<br />
		+	--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 00:55, 16 April 2007 (CEST)

Yonni at 13:19, 15 April 2007

2007-04-15T13:19:27Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 15 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Thanks for adding those links. But the link to the list of Fenix DLL's should be handles by the category link DLL, no? I dunno exactly how this works.<br>		Thanks for adding those links. But the link to the list of Fenix DLL's should be handles by the category link DLL, no? I dunno exactly how this works.<br>
	--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 02:09, 14 April 2007 (CEST)		--[[User:Sandman\|Sandman]] 02:09, 14 April 2007 (CEST)
		+
		+	I thought that the category was for anything to do with DLLs (inc functions, general information, etc) and therefore a list of DLLs was neccesary to narrow this to just the pages of the DLLs. But if I'm wrong I'll put things back to the way they were. What do you think?<br>
		+	--[[User:Yonni\|Yonni]] 14:18, 15 April 2007 (GMT)

Sandman at 00:09, 14 April 2007

2007-04-14T00:09:25Z

New page

Thanks for adding those links. But the link to the list of Fenix DLL's should be handles by the category link DLL, no? I dunno exactly how this works.<br>
--[[User:Sandman|Sandman]] 02:09, 14 April 2007 (CEST)